Contact me View My Work

A second pair of eyes that ships.

Code Review

Built to Find. Designed to Fix.

A written review of the repository: architecture, auth, tests and what is safe to ship.

Built by Muhammad Adil

I open the repository and write a structured review — risks, opportunities and what to do next.

Built by Muhammad Adil Sydney-based engineering, delivered directly.

Start Your Project View my Work
Developer working on a product
  • Architecture Structure that will last
  • Auth & env Secrets and sessions
  • Tests What actually covers risk
  • Launch Store, web, production

  • Code Review

    Sydney-based delivery with Australia-wide support

    Scoped, documented, and measurable—aligned with Australian operators.

  • Code Review

    Clear scope, milestones and production-ready handover

    Scoped, documented, and measurable—aligned with Australian operators.

  • Code Review

    Practical recommendations—not buzzwords

    Scoped, documented, and measurable—aligned with Australian operators.

  • Code Review

    Integrates with your existing tools and team

    Scoped, documented, and measurable—aligned with Australian operators.

Code review

What the review covers

I open the repository and write findings on structure, architecture, dependencies, security and leftover AI-generated code.

Structure, duplication, dead paths, test gaps and dependency risk in the repository you already have.

Talk to me

How the API, auth, data and client meet, and what breaks when the next ten users arrive.

See a project

Secrets in the repository, auth gaps, over-exposed endpoints and stale dependencies. This is a review, not a penetration test.

See a case study

Invented packages, unused generated files and features that compile but do not match the product.

AI app evaluation

Code review

What gets read

What a production readiness review covers

The repository, staging URL or TestFlight build: architecture, auth, environment, error paths and launch risk. The write-up separates what can ship from what should be rewritten.

See a project Fleet management at a dealership — Fleet management platform

How I deliver code review in Sydney

Written findings with severity, evidence and a recommended next step. Fixing the issues is a separate piece of work if you want it.

Talk to me Customer experience at a vehicle showroom — Fleet management platform

A typical review

Catching risk before launch

Challenge

An AI-built app compiled and looked demo-ready, but auth, environment config and error paths were not safe to put in front of customers.

Solution

I open the repository, list defects with severity and evidence, and separate what can ship from what should be rewritten.

Services

Next steps

Where to start

I read the repository, staging site or TestFlight build and write what is safe to ship. Pick the next step that matches what you already have.

Talk to me

Tell me the repository or build you want inspected. I reply within one business day.

Talk to me

Talk to me

AI-built or vibe-coded app already shipped a lot of surface area? Send access and the decision you need — ship-now vs rewrite — before you scale spend.

Talk to me

See a project

Look at a product already in use before we talk about the review.

View the project

AI app evaluation

Need a broader product verdict than a repo review? See AI app evaluation from the same Sydney engineer.

AI app evaluation

See a case study

A mobile product that has been in the stores for years, if you want a longer example.

Case study

Questions

A few direct answers

Clear answers from me in Sydney — the questions I hear most before a build starts.

Talk to me
Do you review code for AI-built or vibe-coded apps in Sydney?

Yes. I'm Muhammad Adil, one engineer in Sydney — not an agency review team. Founders send me a repo when an AI-built app shipped a lot of surface area and they need someone to say what is real before they scale spend.

What do you actually inspect in a code review?

The repo, architecture, dependencies, performance, security and whether the product can be owned after launch. I name risks in the code, not a rebrand. That is how I work on products I ship, including long-term React Native work like Di Lorenzo / My Fit Spot.

When is a code review better than rebuilding or a full AI app evaluation?

Use a review when you already have a shipped app and need a go/no-go on the codebase. If you need a broader product verdict, see AI app evaluation: https://madil.com.au/services/ai-app-evaluation/. If the right call is a new build, I do that as app development — same engineer, Sydney: https://madil.com.au/services/app-development/.

How does a code review engagement with you work?

I scope the repo, the risks that matter, and what you need written down. Then I review and send a clear report. Talk to me via the form on this page or https://madil.com.au/contact/ if you want that from Sydney.

Start with the repository

I reply myself, usually within one business day.

  • One engineer reads the code. The repository, staging site or TestFlight build: architecture, auth, environment and launch risk.
  • A written result. Findings with severity and evidence, plus what can ship and what should be rewritten.

Code review in Sydney with me — ship-now vs rewrite, with evidence.

Same-day Sydney overlap. No offshore handoff.

I list what is safe to show customers and what still needs engineering — before launch spend scales.

Contact Us